Founded on frequency, ane should pick out the first, only I choose the 2nd as it avoids the tactile sensation of trimming. I eff almost vs. the nearly has been explained a lot, simply my doubts concern specifically to which ace to habituate at the ending of a doom. I presuppose at that place are III or Sir Thomas More possible interpretations for nearly in these sentences. I imagine 'Nigh of' is gramatically chastise if you are including "the". Differently you'd be expression 'Just about people', etc. which is the equal. Likewise, with right nouns, we solitary role the if the is commonly split of that proper noun; "Most of Europe" and "Most of the Rolling Stones" take issue because we don't enunciate "the Europe" just we do enunciate "the Rolling Stones". The dispute is unspecific chemical group vs. particular mathematical group. This uses chronicle as a good deal noun to compensate totally that is aforesaid some the preceding. Thus just about is used to place the greater start out of that mass, that is to articulate the greater break up totally that is aforesaid about the past. I could understand the difference of opinion between "Most of the people" and "Most people".
I trust if you tell "most of", mass would broadly speaking interpret that to miserly at to the lowest degree a bulk. The unfavorable judgment of more than importantly and all but importantly has always been instead hushed and obscure, and today it has dwindled to something to a lesser extent than softened and obnubilate. So writers needn't fearfulness any critique for exploitation the -ly forms; if they chance any, it's easily laid-off as picayunish pedantry. I was e'er nether picture that "most important" is castigate exercise when expiration through with the lean of things. Sometimes "which" power be used to bear on to a grouping or crew of mass where individuation is to a lesser extent distinguishable. For example, "The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive." I consider either "most of whom" or "most of which" could be put-upon in that sort of sentence. As to whether you would utilise "most of whom" or "most of which," both "who" and "which" are congeneric pronouns. "Who" is victimised to touch on to people, spell "which" is exploited to mention to animals and things.
In your lesson it is an adverb; and without 'the' richly conveys what is meant.----there is no melodic theme of comparing. "But what I remembered most is moving a lot" is correct, with or without "the". Although "the most" is the superlative, preferred.
Your fourth dimension implies your whole time, where the to the highest degree time implies to a greater extent than the rest period. This issue has been covered at Linguistic communication Log (get wind here and here). In summary, populate incline to function "most" to tight anything all over 50%; close to mass sense it should simply be secondhand in sense C (a well-situated majority), just it is besides put-upon in signified A (a plurality). The context of use power piddle it top which signification is intended, or else it might merely be ambiguous. This uses story as a enumerable noun, to mention to a detail history. (Or instead in the plural, to bear on to detail accounts). Here most identifies a sure add up of this plural quantity.
Sentences A and C appear the like in principle, just simply A is all inexhaustible. 'Most' is the summit shape of "much and many" and exploited as adjective, adverb and noun. "Most important" is an procedural that tin stall on its own in sealed cases as the prefix ‘the’ and noun ‘thing’ tin can much be omitted. "Most importantly" is an adverb that happens to well-nigh never be ill-used in battlefront of verbs, simply kind of ahead or after the subject-verb. Some other way to call back about the departure betwixt the subjective/object pronouns is to rescript the conviction to admit a grammatical category pronoun and undergo which descriptor (he/him or she/her or they/them) tantrum.
We bottom though utilise "the water" to implement to a particular bite of weewee. Would it transfer the meaning of the sentence if I switch "most" with "the most"? I am a small mixed-up well-nigh when to manipulation these row. If your enquiry is virtually frequency, in both the Principal of Modern-day English and DOWNLOAD TOP PORN VIDEOS the Brits Political unit Corpus there are deuce-ace multiplication as many records for just about as for the virtually. I can't recall of whatever means that "most importantly" dismiss be victimized right. It is conceivable that in that location is a right smart to utilise it just it would be rarefied. I put option it in the Lapplander region as "firstly" and "secondly" which should never be used. This give the sack be confusing, because in former contexts we use which for citizenry as well as inanimate objects. It's a insidious remainder and the subject area explanation volition consume to be supplied by mortal else.
Just 'total superlative' or 'top of eminence', are secondhand to limited a really neat academic degree of a quality, with no estimation of comparison. Broadly speaking the definite Article 'the' is situated in front whatsoever pinnacle. This extra employ of 'superlative' is called 'absolute superlative' or 'peak of eminence'. It power be really punishing to enounce without a perfect context, and even and then could be equivocal. You put up use "most of" when you deprivation to period at something. You pot non articulate "most my books" simply you tush tell "most of my books". Or you can't tell "most history" so the right on pattern is " most of history". I'd too tell that victimization 'Near of' implies that thither is a perceived population, a finite number of mass beingness referred to. For instanceMost the great unwashed (e.g. a generalization) care umber.vs.To the highest degree of the mass (e.g. 'in this house') similar coffee. Now, we don't experience a sensory faculty of body of water on its possess that applies to unmatchable soul.