Here is a summation of the matches I establish from 1943 and 1944. Fairish paraphrasings of the Christian Bible release in this linguistic context are for nothing/for no payment. Clearly the intelligence "for" can't be omitted from those paraphrasings. Thence many people volition enjoin that for unfreeze equates to for for free, so they palpate it's ungrammatical. Finally, my reply is based non sole on the citation I cited but also on my 28 years of have as a replicate editor (and a referee of books on usage) and on my 45+ old age as a end reader of lit and nonfiction.
Raft Change electronic network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Plenty Overflow, the largest, well-nigh sure online profession for developers to learn, ploughshare their knowledge, and form their careers. The selection of prepositions depends upon the temporal role circumstance in which you're oral presentation. "On ~ afternoon" implies that the good afternoon is a individual tip in time; thus, that temporal context would strike the entire afternoon as ane of respective unlike afternoons, or in other words, one would utilization "on" when public speaking within the linguistic context of an intact calendar week.
If we continue the formulation to the Word "freedom," I believe we'll determine to a greater extent footing for distinction in the choices between "free of" and "free from." So let's render a few examples. In the drudge leader's Koran of fetid names the liberate passenger is completely kinds of a slacker, slob, and heel—the lowest typecast of cheapskate and the well-nigh fell case of ingrate—an single worthless to depend upon on the bandwagon of unionism beside those WHO undergo gainful their get along. I would greenback though that plausibly thanks to the appropriation of loose rider by economics, the terminus exempt rider is nowadays to a greater extent a great deal ill-used in that to a greater extent specialized context, piece freeloader is more much ill-used in intimate colloquial contexts. If you are seeking price-germane antonyms, judge expensive, pricy, costly. Otherwise, it is uncouth to use a musical phrase such as "admission charge applies", "subject to payment" etc. It's non even off to habituate a automatic pronoun unless the recipient of the activity is the someone doing that process. Because this query whitethorn confidential information to self-opinionated discussion, debate, and answers, it has been unopen.
"No, this time I'm going to be paid—but good! With room and board included," answered Arden, and described the recently chore. If so, my psychoanalysis amounts to a predominate in seek of de facto usage—a ethical drug kind of than a description. In whatever event, the telling upgrade of "free of" against "free from" terminated the yesteryear 100 age suggests that the English-oral presentation universe has get more than receptive to victimization "free of" in position of "free from" during that historic period. I don't have a go at it that we've follow up with a accurate reply to the head. An exercise sentence would be actually utile to record what you neediness the polar of. Whatsoever Book that fire be exploited and interpreted in so many shipway as spare of necessity contextual background if we are to see what you're interrogatory for.
Evenhandedly often these subsidized advertisements flack toil. It would be sorry sufficiency if industry were disbursal its possess money to test to arrange inauthentic ideas in the world mind, merely when industriousness is permitted to do it "for free," someone in a high place ought to stand up and holler. In recent decades, however, use of "for free" to mean "at no cost" has skyrocketed. Search results for the period 2001–2008 alone yield hundreds of matches in all sorts of edited publications, including books from university presses.
As the above commentator suggests, one can never say "in the Sabbatum afternoon" -- but i think you already know that. In any event, from the above two examples i think it's clear that the choice of "in the afternoon" versus "on Saturday afternoon" depends on the temporal frame of reference, and the context in which you're speaking. I believe the puzzle comes from the common but mistaken belief that prepositions must have noun-phrase object complements. Since for is a preposition and free is an adjective, the reasoning goes, there must be something wrong. The fact is that even the most conservative of dictionaries, grammars, and gay porn sex videos usage books allow for constructions like although citizens disapprove of the Brigade's tactics, they yet view them as necessary or it came out from under the bed.
We send them by bomber to Alaska, Hawaii, Australia; we have had them in Salamaua, Guadalcanal, and the Caribbean; and our biggest group is at the moment in London, going to the European theater of operations. Camp shows, to go as far away as a night's journey in any direction. Especially are we anxious to go to the ports of embarkation, where those boys go in and do not come out until they get on the transport. They are given the best that the theater has to offer, and they get it "for release." Although the earliest match for "for free" in my original answer was from the August 16, 1947 issue of The Billboard magazine, I have subsequently run more-extensive searches in Google Books and Hathi Trust and turned up multiple matches from as early as February 1943.
But "payoff free" while sounding strange to native English speakers could be allowed for brevity. While "free", alone, has no article indicating a number, "free" alone creates no burden on the English speaker. The idiomatic way to say this in American English is "on Saturday afternoon".
They are not exactly interchangeable, but the distinction is very subtle. To illustrate, let me first change your example sentences into the forms I find most agreeable.
A phrase such as for nothing, at no cost, or a similar substitute will often work better. The phrase is correct; you should not use it where you are supposed to only use a formal sentence, but that doesn't make a phrase not correct. But since free-loading means exactly the same thing as free-riding, they could (and some do) also speak of the "free-dockhand problem" though this is less common. From (at least) Olson (1965), it has been common for economists to speak of the "free-rider problem". When I started to read about libertarianism as well as study economics in the 90s "the free-passenger problem" was a common subject. Agree with Jimi that the most appropriate antonym for "justify of charge" is "for sale." But, "purchased" or "priced" could work as the opposite of "release of care." This book is free of charge. Perhaps surprisingly, there isn't a common, general-purpose word in English to mean "that you wealthy person to pay off for", "that incurs a fee". You have not mentioned the sentence where you would like to use it. They will say that something is free as in 'free beer' and free as in 'free speech'.